Product · July 17, 2026
Client Hunter now compares related agency postings
Client Hunter checks an agency’s other open roles before ranking possible hiring companies.
One posting can leave out the clue another posting reveals
Staffing agencies often describe the same client differently across several open roles. Client Hunter now checks related postings from the agency’s public job board before it broadens the search to possible employers.
The result shows which related roles were compared, the details they share, the details that conflict, and how likely they are to belong to the same hidden client.
Client leads are compared side by side
Possible hiring companies now appear in a ranked comparison with supporting evidence, contradictions, public sources, and a plain-language assessment.
Discovery labels such as Strong lead and Probable are kept separate from Confirmed. This makes a promising research lead useful without presenting it as proven client identity.
Coverage is based on work the system actually completed
For supported job boards, RecruitIQ records whether the worker actually inspected sibling postings. A research run cannot quietly claim that step was completed when the related-posting fetch failed.
Related roles are clues, not proof. Client Hunter still requires corroborating public evidence before it marks a hiring company as confirmed.
- Related-posting comparison is strongest on supported public ATS job boards.
- Unsupported boards still receive public-web research, but the deterministic board check is marked as unavailable.
- Probable and Strong lead results remain review findings, not confirmed client identities.